Michael starts off on how these new ideas can help us out in quadruple areas: passs, memory, height, and sex selection. In the muscles category he talked about using the new genetic techniques to make muscles stronger. When youre at archaic age your muscles tend to get weaker and they start to hurt. With these techniques in repoint when youre at your old age you will non feel old with pain and your strength decreasing. Thats a benefit everyone can agree on, but its in addition a negative conceit to this. The negative is, lets say an jock asks to use these techniques to make their muscles stronger. The question would be would it be white if he had these genes enhanced to fix above average muscle strength? One might argue that in forthwiths society wouldnt this type of enhancement be categorized with steroids and performance enhancing drugs. Both ways will jot to an increase in strength and size.
Michael then goes to his other half in discussing the negative parts of genetic engineering/procedures. In his article he talks about how immoral the thought of cloning someone who has died, for example a famous athlete, and increase him as your own. You choose who your tike will come out like or in other cases whose clone you essential them to be. In cases where parents want the best athlete as a child leads to cases where that child is not as the same level as the normal kids. What I mean by this is that the cloned child has all the physical ability as the original, for example you have a clone of Michael Jordan. The clone physically has the same abilities as the original at every step of the way. In such a case how will you judge athletes at that...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment