How does the identity of consultants impact their work Essay

How does the identity of consultants impact their use - Essay ExampleThis paper explores identity formation in multiple fields of consultancy constitute to adjust how identity impedes job role or whether elements of identity have the potential to enhance relationships intern all(prenominal)y or with external clients. The nature of consultancy According to Alvesson & Robertson (2006, p.220), consultancy firms be highly people dependent and rely heavily upon safe-guarding dedication through identification. The consultancy industry relies on makeupal culture and structure that facilitates allegiance and dependability through diverse social systems that guide control behaviour through management and demand reliability in all aspects of client relationships. In mental theory, the nature of administrational culture or group membership defines team-based hierarchies as beingness highly contributory to self-esteem development and the sustainment of affiliation needs in order to co ntact the pinnacle of total self-development and productivity (Chow, 2009 Gambrel & Cianci, 2003). Affiliation needs are necessary in group-based environments that are people dependent in order to sustain higher self-esteem development and be equal to(p) to link identity with organisational culture. A study utilizing a sample of 79 representatives from four distinctly varied consulting firms place that the role of consultant requires four key dimensions. These include knowledge work, management and membership, personal druthers and external porthole (Alvesson & Empson, 2008). Knowledge work is the active sharing of data between key members of the organisation and promoting knowledge as a regular business trust. Membership ties closely with the psychological principles previously identified as they are related to finding a sense of identity in terms of the organisation and its mission or structure, as well as related to personal orientation, in support of the literature provid ed by Chow (2009) and Gambrel & Cianci (2003). For the sake of this analysis, the spotlight will be on external interface which deals with how the organisation or the individual is seen by others in the external environment. Kipping & Armbruster (2002) recognise that consultants have a uncontrollable time legitimizing their profession to the outside world and clients. There is a general misconception about consultancy work that exists in the external community and external marketplace that is build on scepticism of its validity with perceptions that the field is borne less(prenominal) of expertise and knowledge, but more as masters of persuasion (Kitay & Wright, 2007, p.1619). This pervading professional and social attitude regarding consultancy work maintains the potential to have negative impact on the self-confidence development of consultant workers that could have ramifications for their practice activities and general attitude. A deficient sense of the self has a profound imp act on psychological functioning as well as interpersonal behaviour (Reasoner, 2009, p.2). Much to the disadvantage of the consultant, the majority of their relations are with the external environment in the form of client relationships. When consultants are put into the position of having to perpetually