Martin Luther King, Jr. and Aung San Suu Kyi Essay

Both Martin Luther power, junior and Aung San Suu Kyi were peacefully skanky social activists who used their views and outlooks on how life should be to change the world around them. While Aung San Suu Kyi lived in Burma and fought for a democracy in her plain, Martin Luther fag, Jr. fought for equal rights in America. During the movements they were leading and participating in, both Suu Kyi and exponent wrote exception solelyy touching writings that are still seen as huge pieces of history today. Their writings stirred people by showing them how super flawed their societies really were. During Martin Luther King, Jr.s time in jail, he wrote a garner that is titled, The Letter from Birmingham City Jail, which explained that he was in Birmingham Jail because injustice was there, and he tells to the highest degree how there should not be segregation. By contrast, in Aung San Suu Kyis writing, In Quest of Democracy, she wrote intimately her views on democracy and her efforts to create one.They both wanted equality and more rights through non-violent means, and the way they wrote about those desires for justice was stirring to their people because each told familiar stories that related to personal experiences that their people had. Throughout all of Kings anti-segregation efforts, he was the head of some(prenominal) movements that impacted thousands. For instance, King was involved in the capital of Alabama Bus Boycott, Albany Movement, Birmingham Campaign, March on Washington, the Chicago Housing Movement, and a few others. While King was in jail, he wrote a letter addressing the wrong things that were done to him and how he thought it was unjust. In his letter he wrote, Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere (204). By saying this, he showed that the reason he was in Birmingham fighting for civil rights was because equal rights has to start somewhere, and once it starts, it will spread. Martin Luther King, Jr. shows how the States are hy pocritical because they claim, The goal of America is freedom, but yet they are being governed by Jim shoot a line Laws (215).King used the power of words and non-violent resistance to start a movement that changed the world. Aung San Suu Kyi was a cleaning woman that lived in Burma,and after she studied abroad for a while, she returned to see how isolated her country was. She then do efforts to speak out against her dictator, U Ne Win, and start a movement toward a democracy and military man rights. When Suu Kyis efforts started reaching other people and a movement was started, she was put under theatre of operations generate and all ties to the outside world were cut off. Aung San Suu Kyi wrote the piece, In Quest of Democracy to try to spread her efforts to make headway Burma a democracy. Suu Kyi explains how the government is at fault for a countrys despairs by saying, The root of a nations misfortunes has to be sought in the moral failings of the government (221). Suu Ky i similarly used her pietism to help spread her movement of a democracy.For example, she use non-violence, which is the eighth of The Ten Duties of Kings. Finally, since Aung San Suu Kyi was put under house arrest, her movement ended with her isolation. Next, Aung San Suu Kyi and Martin Luther King Jr. were able to express their beliefs non-violently in their countries. Throughout both of their lives they followed Gandhis non-violence movement. While King state, Nonviolent campaigns aimed at ending racial segregation across the South (202), Suu Kyi also peacefully used democracy to reverse the process of decline (222).While Christian was the main devotion in America, Buddhism was the main religion in Burma. King and Suu Kyi used allusions to the scriptures of their religions to touch their people. Both King and Suu Kyi were extremely passionate about their movements and were determined to do anything they had to in order to reach their goals. Suu Kyi explains how, In Burma, dist anced by several(prenominal) decades of isolationism from political and intellectual developments in the outside world. (220) Finally, they both had similar morals in the accompaniment that they wanted equal rights for all humanity even though Suu Kyi was on house arrest and King was suppressed from being a different ethnicity.All in all, Martin Luther King, Jr. and Aung San Suu Kyi were social activists who created movements from their own views that changed many peoples lives. Both supported and acted in a non-violent way. Therefore, Aung San Suu Kyi fought against the dictator of her country in order to form a democracy, and Martin Luther King, Jr. fought for anti-segregation, so that all Americans, no matter what ethnicity, would be treated equally. Each of them showed the people of their country how flawed their nation was bywriting pieces while imprisoned for committing no crime. For instance, in Amnesty International, it stated She had committed no crime (Amnesty Internation al) describing how Suu Kyi was imprisoned for doing nothing wrong. Finally, both Aung San Suu Kyi and Martin Luther King, Jr. were persistent activists who aspired and conquered their goals and ambitions to the best of their ability. works CitedAustin, Michael, and Karen Austin. Reading the World Ideas That Matter. New York W.W. Norton, 2007. Print.