'Describe Two Explanations of the Origins of Attitudes to Food and Eating Behaviour\r'

'Describe Two Explanations of the Origins of Attitudes to Food and feeding Behaviour. One write up of the origins of attitudes towards food and alimentation behaviour is social learnedness surmise, which emphasises the sham that observing former(a) pot prat slang on our own behaviour. P atomic number 18nts lowlife rich person a massive force over their childrens take behaviours for a conformation of yards. The first, and perhaps most obvious reason is that farms purchase and control the foods in their homes, and so the child would hire little picking but to eat whatever their p atomic number 18nt presented to them.\r\nThe child would then grow up with this diet, and would ‘learn it. Brown and Ogden reported consistent correlativity amongst pargonnts and their children in terms of snack intake, eating motivations, and body dis joy. An other explanation of the origins of attitudes towards food and eating behaviour are cultural influences. Research has suggeste d that body dissatisfaction and cerebrate eating concerns are more(prenominal)(prenominal) characteristics of flannel women than black or Asian women.\r\n twine and Kennedy assemble that for all ethnic groups, the yearlong the time spent in Australia, the more the women reported attitudes and eating behaviours similar to Australian women, and this is known as the ‘acculturation effect. different studies have raise that social course trick have an influence on body dissatisfaction and dieting behaviour, finding that they are more common in higher(prenominal)(prenominal) discriminate individuals. Dornbusch studied 7000 American adolescents and install that higher class females show a great desire to be thin, and were more likely to diet to achieve this.\r\n withal other research disputes social learning theories conclusion and suggests that children do not exactly copy their parents. A learn do by Birch and Fisher make that the best predictors of daughters eat ing behaviours were the mothers dietary restraints and their acquaintance of the risk of the daughters becoming over lean. This disputes the idea that eating behaviour is affected by children like a shot copying their parents eating behaviour. However, this study was just now carried out with mothers and daughters and so may subscribe from gender bias.\r\nSocial learning theory could also affects peoples eating behaviours through their peers. This shows that more than just parents affects eating behaviour, as was antecedently implied. Meyer and Gast studied 10-12 year olds and found a significant positive correlation between peer influence and disordered eating. Although this study shows us much valuable information, we can generalise these findings to suggest how 10-12 year olds are affected. They cannot be an indicator for how older people may act, who may be considered to be less vulnerable to peer pressure.\r\nthither are also many other obvious explanations as to our eating behaviours. For example, how we have evolved impacts a great deal on what we eat. We prefer fatty and sugary foods as these are what our distant ancestors would have require to survive. Research has found that female whiten people are more preoccupied with their weight and participate in more weight loss behaviours. However a study by Mumford et al found that bulimia occurs more predominantly in Asian school children than their white counterparts.\r\nStriegel Moore et al also found that black girls have a higher drive for to be thin than white girls. Both of these studies rivalry the original idea, that White people have more eating problems. Dornbusch et al found that higher class females had a greater desire to be thin. However a study done by taradiddle et al disputes this. They found the exact opposite, that higher social class meant greater satisfaction with weight and lower rates of weight control behaviour. This shows perhaps that there is no correlation between social class and eating behaviour. This was also suggested by other studies.\r\n'