Drug Legalization - Philosophy Talk

Thomas doubting Thomas was an significant Christian philosopher of the thirteenth century, and he wrote his Summa Theologica between 1265 and 1273. The doctrine of doubting Thomas was grounded in Aristotle's Metaphysics. Aquinas' mentor was Albert the Great, one of the first scholars to put gentile philosophy to work in the service of Catholic theology, and Aquinas carried this approach to its zenith. Thomistic philosophy is basically Aristotelian in methodological analysis and point of view. It is empirical and realist. Thomas preferred an order of mull that presup comprise the liberal arts and mathematics, and he began with Aristotelian logic; travel through internal philosophy involving all the natural sciences, including psychological science; treated moral philosophy, including political science; and concluded with metaphysics, or first philosophy, which today would include epistemology and natural theology. Moral philosophy for Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas presupposes psychology and deals with human happiness, the goal of each person in this life, and the optimum (morally good) means of attaining that goal for the exclusive the family, and the body politic:

The foundation of both goal and constitute means is called the natural law

In creating laws that prohibit the use of harmful drugs, society is doing a effect of things which be in agreement with the views of these philosophers, even though the philosophers capability disagree about some of these springs. Whether we see human behavior as gauged by cerebrate or experience, by natural law or individual experience, we see that society makes a determination as to what is or is not proper behavior. In terms of the use of harmful drugs, there are ii primary reasons for instituting such laws: 1) for the treasureion of the individual; and 2) for the protection of others in society. The first of these shows society in a parental role, qualification decisions as to what will harm the individual and then lofty certain behavior as a result. The second reason recognizes that the person taking harmful drugs could bring harm to others.

This is understandably when we are dealing with drug use and certain occupations, such as airline pilot, and it should be clear in oecumenic with people driving vehicles that could harm others if the driver is not at his or her best and most aware. In truth, though, the two reasons are not easily separable.

We can have recourse to reason or experience, to natural law or custom, and come to the kindred conclusion--drug use is harmful to the individual and to society, and society has the right to protect itself and to protect its members from the effects of drug use and from the danger posed by encouraging drug use. Drug laws derive in truth much from custom, and admittedly they also create custom o'er time as we learn the lesson they are intended to teach. So long as we recognize, as does Aquinas, that human beings are naturally social beings, we have to also accept Hume's idea of utility program as requiring certain behavior in order to protect that social element in our nature.

Kant says that he is acting in the same manner as Socrates--he is not teaching anything rising but bringing the truth out of those who know it without fellow feeling that
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!