Machiavelli's Political Theory

In his chief aim of winning and controlling big businessman, the true leader must not consider the impact of his actions on the vulgar masses (i.e., the common land man): "A prince should then look mainly to winning, and to the successful sustenance of his state. The means which he employs for this get out eternally be accounted honorable, and will be praised by everybody; for the common bulk atomic number 18 always taken by appearances and by results, and it is the vulgar mass that constitutes the foundation" (Machiavelli 87).

In recom workforceding advice to potential princes for keep opening indicant, Machiavelli argues that in a time of putrescence and power jockeying among political forces, the true prince must bring obliging unity to the state through any means at his disposal. The means the uses are never considered unethical or lowly if they achieve the ends ? civil unity. To this end, Machiavelli argues that a true prince should strive to be vexationed rather than distinguishd because it is only fear that keeps men in line, so-to-speak. Thus, Machiavelli comes to the conclusion that while a leader should try not to arouse hatred in the people, he should use fear as the chief means of control rather than love "To come back now to the question whether it be split up to be beloved than feared, I conclude that, as men love of their own free will

Locke's most profound theory is his interpretation of natural equity as something that gives the single(a) an innate claim to indefeasible rights. These rights, alike(p) liberty and property, are indispensable in each individual, and administration exists only to preserve the individual's rights, and the indefeasibility of such rights is a limitation on the authority of both. The king is responsible to the people and community, with power having limits repayable to moral law and constitutional traditions and conventions. However, this moral law to Locke is discoverable in the moral principles as outlined by the Bible, which teaches the individual his duties and obligations. God has supplied for humans the ability of discovering through ration a better way of living, one that is based on virtue.

Locke was considered a radical thinker when it came to his views on religious tolerance. These ideas are inherent in modern American society but they were in direct opposition to the Catholic King of England when he proposed them. Locke felt that both sides should have an equal chance to air their beliefs and that recreation would only come through both parties reaching a middle ground. Still, Locke spoke out against false prophets who used the perform as a political tool to maintain power or exert influence over others. As he writes in A Letter Concerning Toleration, "For whatsoever some people boast of the antiquity of places and names, or of the pomp of outward fear; others, of the reformation of their discipline; all, of the orthodoxy of their faith?for everyone is orthodox to himself?these things, and all others of this nature, are much rather marks of men striving for power and empire over one another than of the Church of christ" (A Letter 1).

Therefore, the leader in Machiavelli's political theory is not judged morally by his ability to promote the common adept and preserve justice. The leader in Machiavelli's view needs be judged only on his ability to use power to maintain l
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!